The Role of AI in Enhancing Creativity among University Art students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26437/gxsrcb23Keywords:
Artificial intelligence. artmaking. creativity. creative design. studentsAbstract
Purpose: This study examines the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing creativity among university art students, focusing on the AI tools they integrate into their creative workflows, how they use these tools, and the influence and challenges they pose to the artmaking process.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This qualitative study employs a case study design with 14 visual communication students from a public university, purposively selected. Data were collected through interviews and analysed thematically.
Research Limitation: The study is limited to a small sample from one public university and does not include quantitative measures of creativity or broader generalisation.
Findings: The fourteen student participants use a wide range of AI tools in their art-making, with each typically relying on at least three. Tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, WhatsApp AI, Meta AI, Gemini, Claude AI, DeepSeek, Chroma AI, Notion AI, Qwen AI, DALL·E, DALL·E 2, Midjourney, ImageFX, DeepDream, Canva AI, Microsoft Bing Image Creator, QuillBot, and Grammarly are used by participants in creating art. AI supports the students across all stages of art-making, including ideation, image creation, design refinement, mock-ups, and text editing. It streamlines technical tasks, enhances conceptual clarity, expands creative possibilities, and improves efficiency by enabling early visualisation of ideas. However, it also shifts creative agency, risks overreliance on AI-generated outputs, and raises concerns about authorship and originality. Additionally, challenges such as cultural inaccuracies, difficulty interpreting prompts, low-quality outputs, and limited contextual depth reduce its reliability, particularly in culturally specific and image-based projects.
Practical Implication: The findings highlight the need for art education to integrate AI literacy while maintaining strong traditional creative skills and critical engagement with AI tools.
Social Implication: Effective integration of AI in art education can foster innovation while ensuring ethical awareness and cultural sensitivity in creative practices.
Originality/Value: This study contributes to emerging scholarship on AI in art education by providing empirical insights into how AI shapes students’ creative processes, highlighting both its opportunities and limitations.
References
Akverdi, C., & Baykal, G. E. (2024). Generative AI tools in design fields: opportunities and challenges in the ideation process. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3677045.3685445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3677045.3685445
Ali Elfa, M. A., & Dawood, M. E. T. (2023). Using artificial intelligence for enhancing human creativity. Journal of Art, Design and Music, 2(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.55554/2785-9649.1017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55554/2785-9649.1017
Braguez, J. (2023). AI as a creative partner: Enhancing artistic creation and acceptance. In Proceedings of The Barcelona Conference on Arts, Media & Culture. Retrieved from https://papers.iafor.org/wp content/uploads/papers/bamc2023/ BAMC2023_72833.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2435-9475.2023.11
Dawood, R. M. E. T. (2024). Artificial intelligence ethics: A discussion of potential risks and associated ethical dilemmas in art and design. The Arab Association of Civilization and Islamic Arts in partnership with French APTEES Foundation, 4(23), 370–385. Doi: 10.21608/JSOS.2023.210822.1402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jsos.2023.210822.1402
Elgammal, A., Liu, B., Elhoseiny, M., & Mazzone, M. (2017). CAN: Creative adversarial networks. Generating “Art” by learning about styles and deviating from style norms. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Creativity. Atlanta, GA. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.07068
Garcia, M. B. (2025). The paradox of artificial creativity: Challenges and opportunities of generative AI artistry. Creativity Research Journal, 37(4), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2024.2354622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2024.2354622
Grassini, S. (2025). Computational power and subjective quality of AI-generated outputs: The case of aesthetic judgement and positive emotions in AI-generated art. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 41(14), 9056–9065. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2422755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2422755
Grassini, S., & Koivisto, M. (2025). Artificial creativity? Evaluating AI against human performance in creative interpretation of visual stimuli. International journal of human computer interaction, 41(7), 4037–4048. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2345430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2345430
Griebel, M., Flath, C., & Friesike, S. (2020). Augmented creativity: Leveraging artificial intelligence for idea generation in the creative sphere. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rip/77
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Centre for Curriculum Redesign: Boston.
Hutson, J., & Cotroneo, P. (2023). Generative AI tools in art education: Exploring prompt engineering and iterative processes for enhanced creativity. Metaverse, 4(1), 1–14. doi: 10.54517/m.v4i1.2164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/m.v4i1.2164
Işık, V. (2024). Exploring artistic frontiers in the era of artificial intelligence. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 14(2), 577–603. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1603119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1603119
Issak, A., Rezwana, J., & Harteveld, C. (2025). MOSAAIC: Managing Optimization towards Shared Autonomy, Authority, and Initiative in Co-creation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.11481
Li, X. (2024). Breaking the shackles: The transformation of artistic creation under the background of AI images. In S. Kaki, Y. Wu, & R. Hashim (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2024 6th International Conference on Literature, Art and Human Development. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-319-1_32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-319-1_32
Liu, B. (2023). Arguments for the rise of artificial intelligence art: Does AI art have creativity, motivation, self-awareness and emotion? Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 35(3), 811–822. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/aris.83808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.83808
Lovelace, J., Kishore, V., Wan, C., Shekhtman, E., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2023). Latent diffusion for language generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 56998–57025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52202/075280-2492
Ma, X., Fang, G., & Wang, X. (2024). DeepCache: Accelerating diffusion models for free. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 15762–15772. Retrieved from https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2024/papers/Ma_DeepCache_Accelerating_Diffusion_Models_for_Free_CVPR_2024_paper.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01492
Makokha, J. M. (2022). Collaborative Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Idea Generation in Design Teams. Dissertation, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/73b3f7700c792a8edc57adc1c0235054/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
McCormack, J., Gifford, T., & Hutchings, P. (2019). Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art. In EvoMUSART 2019: 8th International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16667-0_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16667-0_3
Monser, M., & Fadel, E. (2023). A modern vision in the applications of artificial intelligence in the field of visual arts. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Art and Technology, 6(1), 73–104. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijmsat.2024.274900.1021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ijmsat.2024.274900.1021
Oksanen, A., Cvetkovic, A., Akin, N., Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Chen, Y., & Savela, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in fine arts: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004
Oustamanolakis, M. (2024). Creativity, and AI: Strategies for Cultivating Idea Generation in Design Education. In International Conference of Art, Design & Technology. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4341-7_27
Pareschi, R. (2024). Centaur Art: The Future of Art in the Age of Generative AI. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031- 69063-1_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69063-1_1
Piskopani, A. M., Chamberlain, A., & Ten Holter, C. (2023). Responsible AI and the arts: The ethical and legal implications of AI in the arts and creative industries. In Proceedings of the first international symposium on trustworthy autonomous system. https://doi.org/10.1145/3597512.3597528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3597512.3597528
Rahman, G., Almutairi, E. A. A., Mudhsh, B. A., & Al-Yafaei, Y. (2025). Harnessing generative AI for collaborative creativity: A study of university students’ engagement and innovation. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(3), 3284-3296. DOI: 10.53894/ijirss.v8i3.7227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i3.7227
Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., & Chen, M. (2022). Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.06125
Rashid, S. T., & Abdullah, H. S. (2025). Performance Evaluation System Based on Classroom Scene Analysis Using a Hybrid Deep Learning Technique. African Journal of Applied Research, 11(5), 201–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26437/jm4hv924
Reynolds, T. J., & Batley, A. (2024). Exploring the impact of generative AI on concept generation, ideation, and design methodology: In product design education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education. https://doi.org/10.35199/EPDE.2024.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35199/EPDE.2024.7
Rezwana, J., & Maher, M. L. (2022). Understanding user perceptions, collaborative experience and user engagement in different human-AI interaction designs for co-creative systems. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3532789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3532789
Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Retrieved from https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2022/papers/Rombach_High-Resolution_Image_Synthesis_With_Latent_Diffusion_Models_CVPR_2022_paper.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042
Saharia, C., Chan, W., Saxena, S., Li, L., Whang, J., Denton, E. L., ... & Norouzi, M. (2022). Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35, 36479–36494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52202/068431-2643
Sakhno, L., Tkal, Y., Sushko, D., Ocheret'ko, L., & Shevchenko, Y. (2025). AI Era in Reporting and Managerial Accounting: Implications, Pitfalls and Potentials. African Journal of Applied Research, 11(7), 260–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26437/cbvda207
Singh, S., Hindriks, K., Heylen, D., & Baraka, K. (2025). A systematic review of human-ai co-creativity. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.21333
Shen, Y., & Yu, F. (2021). The influence of artificial intelligence on art design in the digital age. Scientific programming, 4838957. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4838957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4838957
Vahdat, A., Williams, F., Gojcic, Z., Litany, O., Fidler, S., & Kreis, K. (2022). Lion: Latent point diffusion models for 3d shape generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 10021–10039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52202/068431-0728
Wei, X., Wang, L., Lee, L. K., & Liu, R. (2025). The effects of generative AI on collaborative problem-solving and team creativity performance in digital story creation: an experimental study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00526-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00526-0
Wu, X. (2022). Creative painting with latent diffusion models. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.14697
Yusa, I. M. M., Yu, Y., & Sovhyra, T. (2022). Reflections on the use of artificial intelligence in works of art. Journal of Aesthetics, Design, and Art Management, 2(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.58982/jadam.v2i2.334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58982/jadam.v2i2.334
Zhou, K. Q., & Nabus, H. (2023). The ethical implications of DALL-E: Opportunities and challenges. Mesopotamian Journal of Computer Science, 2023, 16-21. https://doi.org/10.58496/MJCSC/2023/003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58496/MJCSC/2023/003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 AFRICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting and publishing your articles in the African Journal of Applied Research, you agree to transfer the copyright of the Article from the authors to the Journal ( African Journal of Applied Research).
