Semantic Prosody of 'Vigilante' and 'Vigilantism' in Ghana's Print Media: A Corpus-Based Inquiry

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26437/0er33f32

Keywords:

Corpus linguistics, newspaper, semantic prosody, vigilante, vigilantism

Abstract

Purpose: Socio-political studies on vigilantism have highlighted the negative acts that vigilantes of political parties often engage in, especially during elections in Ghana. However, linguistic studies examining this negative view of vigilantes and vigilantism are lacking in the Ghanaian context. The present study, therefore, explored the semantic prosody of the words "vigilante" and “vigilantism” from a corpus-based perspective.

Design/Methodology/Approach: The study utilised a corpus of newspaper articles on vigilante activity and vigilantism, sourced from the Daily Graphic and the Daily Guide, covering the period from 2016 to 2019. The corpus analysis software AntConc 3.5.7 (Windows, 2018) was employed to display the collocates of the two words. Subsequently, the concordance lines of these collocates were examined to determine their semantic prosodies.

Findings: The results indicated that both “vigilante” and “vigilantism” possess negative semantic prosody, primarily due to the negative context in which their collocates are used.

Research Limitation: The study was limited to newspaper articles from only two newspapers within a specific timeframe (2016 - 2019), which may not capture the full range of linguistic representations of vigilantism in the Ghanaian media or other discourse domains.

Practical Implication: The findings suggest the need for further linguistic studies on “vigilante” and “vigilantism”, employing other linguistic methods such as Critical Discourse Analysis and Transitivity analysis, to deepen understanding of their representation in discourse.

Social Implication: The present study has demonstrated that language, whether deliberate or not, reflects socio-political sentiments regarding the state of political vigilantism in Ghana.

Originality/Value: This study addresses a gap in linguistic research on “vigilante” and “vigilantism” in Ghana, offering original insights into the semantic prosody of these terms and highlighting the importance of linguistic perspectives for understanding socio-political phenomena.

Author Biographies

  • S. Gyamera, Cape Coast Technical University

    She is a Lecturer in the Department of Liberal & Communication Studies at the Cape Coast Technical University, Cape Coast, Ghana 

  • W. C. Davis, Takoradi Technical University

    Dr. Wilhelmina Coker Davis is a Lecturer in the Centre for Languages and Liberal Studies at the Takoradi Technical University, Takoradi, Ghana.

  • U. S. Tetteh, Cape Coast Technical University

    Prof. Uriah Stonewell Tetteh is an Associate Professor in the Department of Liberal & Communication Studies at the Cape Coast Technical University, Cape Coast, Ghana.

  • C. D. Techie, Cape Coast Technical University

    Dr. Cynthia Derx Techie is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Liberal & Communication Studies at the Cape Coast Technical University, Cape Coast, Ghana.

References

Abrahamsen, R., & Williams, M. C. (2016). Public attitudes toward vigilantism: A

comparative study. Journal of Social Issues, 72(3), 456–472.

Alcarez-Marmol, G., & Almela, S. J. (2016). The semantic prosody of the words, inmigracion and inmigrante in the Spanish written media. A corpus-based study of two national newspapers. Revista signos. Estudios de linguistica, 49 (91), 145–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342016000200001

Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Aning, K., & Lartey, E. (2018). Security and vigilantism in Ghana: Socio-political

implications. African Security Review, 27(2), 123–139.

Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996

Baker, P. (2019). Corpus methods in discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Baker, P., & Levon, E. (2017). Semantic prosody revisited: A corpus-driven approach.

Language and Communication, 54, 45–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2002.988364

Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. Continuum.

Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Blackwell.

Biber, D. (1998). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.

Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (3rd ed.). (2008). Cambridge University Press.

Dressler, W. (2002). Introduction to text linguistics. Routledge.

Firth, J. R. (1957). A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930-1955. In Liu Runqing et al (Eds). Readings in Linguistics: Seventy-Five Years Since Saussure. Vol. 1, 328-359. Cehui Press.

Gyampo, R., Graham, E., & Asare, K. (2017). Political vigilantism and democratic governance in Ghana’s Fourth Republic. African Review of Economics and Finance, 9(2), 114–136.

Haas, N. E. (2010). Public support for vigilantism: An experimental approach. British Journal of Criminology, 50(3), 474–495.

Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming. A new theory of words and language. Routledge.

Hunston, S. (2011). Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841686

Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (2020). Pattern grammar and semantic prosody. Cambridge DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0899.pub2

University Press.

Johnston, L. (1996). What is vigilantism? British Journal of Criminology, 36(2), 220-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014083

Jones, R., & Schmitt, N. (2021). Contextual meaning and semantic prosody: Advances in

corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 26(1), 1–23.

Lentz, C. (2015). Vigilantism and state legitimacy in Ghana. Journal of Modern African

Studies, 53(4), 567–592.

Louw, B. (2020). Semantic prosody and discourse analysis: New perspectives. Discourse

Studies, 22(4), 367–385.

McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2019). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice (2nd ed.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748677382

Cambridge University Press.

McIntosh, C., Francis, B., & Poole, R. (2003). Collocations and semantic prosody. In C. McIntosh (Ed.), Oxford Collocations Dictionary (pp. xx–xx). Oxford University Press.

Merriam-Webster. (2015). Merriam-Webster online thesaurus. Merriam-Webster, Incorporated.

Partington, A. (2018). Patterns and meanings: Using corpora for English language research.

John Benjamins Publishing.

Ramabina, M.T. & Kleinveldt, L. (2023). Online newspaper reading patterns of a university

community before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of the University of Venda. Regional Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 8 (2),66-80.

Rosenbaum, H. J., & Sederberg, P. C. (1994). Vigilantism: An analysis of establishment violence. In H. J. Rosenbaum & P. C. Sederberg (Eds.), Vigilante politics (pp. 1-17). University of Pennsylvania Press.

Stirewalt, C. (2018, January 19). Social media vigilantes fill the void as government falters. Fox News.

Stubbs, M. (2018). Corpus linguistics and semantic prosody. Wiley-Blackwell.

Tongsibsong, S. (2012). Editorials in broadsheet and tabloid newspapers: A genre analysis. Journal of English Studies, 7(1), 1–20.

Tunstall, J. (1996). Newspaper power: The new national press in Britain. Oxford University Press.

http://www.GraphicOnline.com

https://www.dailyguideghana.com

Downloads

Published

13-02-2026

How to Cite

Semantic Prosody of ’Vigilante’ and ’Vigilantism’ in Ghana’s Print Media: A Corpus-Based Inquiry. (2026). AFRICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH, 12(1), 258-277. https://doi.org/10.26437/0er33f32

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)