Design Optimisation of an Automated Traditional Smock (Fugu) Weaving Machine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26437/ajar.v11i3.1159Keywords:
Automation. cultural heritage. smock. warp-shuttle. weavingAbstract
Purpose: The study aims to design, fabricate and evaluate the performance of an automated smock (‘Fugu’) material Weaving Machine.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The research employed a design-based experimental methodology aimed at modernising traditional smock (‘fugu’) weaving processes in Northern Ghana. The machine was built using locally available materials, including mild steel and wooden components, and powered by an electric motor. The design incorporated standard mechanical engineering formulas (e.g., torque, angular velocity, power output) for component dimensioning and force transmission. Observations were analysed comparatively using engineering principles and validated against findings from prior studies and relevant literature, reinforcing the scientific rigour of modifications made to address design limitations.
Research Limitation: The ineffective shedding process, improper warp-shuttle synchronisation, and the short cam were the limitations observed.
Findings: During the fabrication process, the treadles and the picking arms, which enhance the shedding and picking motions, respectively, experienced bending and twisting moments due to the material’s (i.e., ¾ square pipe) inability to withstand mechanical stress. All mechanisms demonstrate a continuous cycle with no requirements for human intervention, except to start the machine.
Social Implications: Weaving has been a key aspect of Ghana’s cultural heritage; therefore, preserving the cultural significance of the art through the use of an automatic weaving machine is ensured.
Practical Implications: The automatic smock (‘fugu’) material weaving machine employs key weaving processes, including beat-up, picking, shedding, let-off, and take-up motions, which utilise an electric motor to minimise manual intervention and enhance production speed. This implies that less human labour is required, thereby the smock material production increases within the shortest possible time with high efficiency.
Originality/Value: The study presents a novel automated weaving machine designed explicitly for weaving local smock (‘fugu’) materials, which traditionally rely on manual looms. Finally, the machine features unique design innovations, such as camshaft-driven dual-picking systems, crankshaft-beater integration, and modified treadle reinforcement.
References
Abraham, E. A., Vincentia, O., & Hateka, D. (2016). Development of a New Loom: Challenges and Prospects. Journal of Asian Vocational Education and Training, 9, 17-29.
Ahiati, E. (2020). Automatic “Kente” Weaving Machine [Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi].
Akinlabi, E. T., & Mahamood, R. M. (2020). Solid-state welding: friction and friction stir welding processes. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Akinwonmi, A. S. (2011). Design and construction of a mechanized loom. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 3(3), 159–171.
Ansah, P. S. (2019). Modern Technological Advances and the Challenges in the Kente Weaving Business of Ghana. Texila International Journal of Academic Research, 6(2), 147–15. https://doi.org/10.21522/tijar.2014.06.02.art001
Ashby, F. M., & Jones, R. H. D. (2012). Engineering Materials 1: an introduction to properties, applications and design (Vol. 1) (pp. 1–14).
Kashif, M., Talha, S., Hamdani, A., Nawab, Y., Asghar, M. A., Umair, M., & Shaker, K. (2019). Optimization of 3D woven preform for improved mechanical performance. 48(7), 1206–1227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083718760802
Khurmi, R. S., & Gupta, J. K. (2005). A textbook of machine design. S. Chand Publishing.
Levin, D. Z., & Barnard, H. (2008). Technology management routines that matter to technology managers. International Journal of Technology Management, 41(1–2), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.015982
Mahendrakar, S. (2016). Design and Vibration analysis of the crank Shaft of the power loom system in the textile industry. 4(6), 150–159.
Mamdouh, F., Reda, M., Abd El-Aziz, H., & Othman, H. (2022). Overview of different fabric structures. Journal of Textiles, Coloration and Polymer Science, 19(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.21608/jtcps.2022.152641.1131
Marks, R., & Robinson, A. T. C. (1976). Principles of weaving.
Mccracken, J. M., Donovan, B. R., & White, T. J. (2020). Materials as Machines. 1906564, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906564
Nawab, Y., Hamdani, S. T. A., & Shaker, K. (2017). Structural Textile Design Interlacing and Interlooping (Issue 112). Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://taylorandfrancis.com/
Quarcoo, F. A. (2020). Traditional textile production and its socio-cultural significance in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 15(2), 45–60.
Sclater, N., & Chironis, N. P. (2007). MECHANISMS AND MECHANICAL DEVICES Fourth Edition (Fourth). McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Seyam, A. M. (2000). Advances in weaving and weaving preparation. Textile Progress, 30(1–2), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405160008688882
Singh, S., Singh, J., & Vig, A. P. (2016). Effect of abiotic factors on the distribution of earthworms in different land use patterns. The Journal of Basic & Applied Zoology, 74, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobaz.2016.06.001
Vaseur, C. (2017). Model-based control design for a high-performant weaving machine : torsional vibration- and backlash compensation using non-linear feedforward control. (Issue 2017).
Williams, R. L. (2022). A Bulleted / Pictorial History of Mechanisms and Machines.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 AFRICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting and publishing your articles in the African Journal of Applied Research, you agree to transfer the copyright of the Article from the authors to the Journal ( African Journal of Applied Research).
