Assessment of Environmental Sustainability Compliance (ESC) and Awareness in Works Procurement Leading Universities in Ghana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26437/ajar.v11i2.1045Keywords:
Compliance. environmental. sustainable development. sustainability. works procurement.Abstract
Purpose: The study explored the level of compliance and integration of environmental sustainability (ES) considerations into the pre-contract stage of public works procurement in leading universities in Ghana and the extent to which awareness is spreading for the advancement of ES.
Design/Methodology/Approach: A qualitative method was adopted for data collection and analysis. Content analyses were carried out on public tender documents from leading Universities in Ghana, and the results were analysed and conclusions drawn.
Research Limitation: The study was limited to Ghana's first three leading Universities. It would have been more informative if it had covered all government institutions, including local institutions, across Ghana's sixteen (16) regions.
Findings: The findings suggest the overall level of ES compliance and integration into the evaluation process is currently low at 41%. However, the awareness of ES considerations in public works procurement is above average at 66%.
Practical implication: The study results inform policymakers, procurement practitioners, and other stakeholders of the low level of ESC and the average level of awareness during the tendering process of works procurement. This can serve as a basis for recommending effective ways of addressing challenges and thus ensuring meaningful compliance with ES, which will help achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs).
Social Implication: This insight can guide developing or adjusting regulations and incentives to promote more effective environmental practices.
Originality/Value: Despite the legislative amendments locally and the global focus on sustainability, research suggests that the integration of environmental sustainability into public works procurement practices remains limited. This is expected to set the pace for further research on addressing these challenges.
References
Adetunji, I., Price, A., Fleming, P., & Kemp, P. (2003). Sustainability and the UK construction industry. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 10(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980310459597
Adetunji, I., Price, A., Fleming, P., & Kemp, P. (2008). Measurement of the sustainability of construction projects. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 161(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.2008.161.2.81
Adham, F., & Siwar, C. (2012). Sustainable development variables affecting construction projects in developing countries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.117
Adjarkol, H., Agyekum, K., Ayarkwa, J., & Amoah, P. (2016). Building Technology Department, Takoradi Polytechnic, GHANA; 2, 3, 4 Department of Building Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, GHANA. Implementing Environmentally Sustainable Construction Principles (ESCPs) in the Ghanaian Construction Industry.
Agbesi, K., Kissi, E. & Adjei-Kumi, T. (2020). Implementation of Sustainable Procurement practices in public sector construction in Ghana.
Ahmed, S. M. (2005). Role of stakeholders' perception in construction project outcome. International Journal of Project Management, 23(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.005
Akcay, E.C., (2023). Barriers to Undertaking Green Building Projects in Developing Countries: A Turkish Perspective. Buildings, 13(4), p.841.
Akenroye, T. O. (2011). A multi-criteria evaluation matrix for building design options. Journal of Facilities Management, 9(3), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961111154268
Akenroye, T. O. (2013). Investigating sustainable building life cycle cost elements. Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v6n1p11
Amaral, D. F., Sivaraman, V., & Shah, H. (2017). Institutional Theory and Sustainable Procurement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2016.09.001
Baiden, B. K. (2006). Analysis of defects in new multifamily construction. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 20(4), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(336)
Bansal, P., Smith, W. K.,v& Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1189-1195.
Bo Xia, Martin Skitmore, Peng Wu, & Qing Chen (2014) How Public Owners Communicate the Sustainability Requirements of Green Design-Build Projects.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Boyd, D., & Schweber, L. (2012). Counteracting construction waste: Co-benefits of sustainability initiatives. Construction Management and Economics, 30(6), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.676657
Brammer, S. & Walker, H., (2007). Sustainable procurement practice in the public sector: An international comparative study. University of Bath School of Management. Working Paper Series.
Bryman, A. (2009). Effective leadership in higher education. International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), 13–32.
Byrch, C., Kearins, K., Milne, M. & Morgan, R., 2007. Sustainable “what”? A cognitive approach to understanding sustainable development. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 4(1), pp.26-52.
Carter, C.R. & Rogers, D.S., 2008. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution and logistics management, 38(5), pp.360-387.
Cato, M. S. (2009). Green economics: An introduction to theory, policy and practice. Earthscan.
Chang, W. Y., Ive, G., & Boussabaine, A. (2016). An investigation of waste reduction practices and their significance in the UK precast concrete industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.094
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). Routledge.
Collins, H., Roberts, K., & Sanders, T. (2006). This mortal coil: The human body in history and culture. Oxford University Press.
Cresswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Cresswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Cresswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Da Ponte, M., Foley, M., & Cho, C. H. (2020). Assessing the degree of sustainability integration in Canadian public sector procurement. Sustainability, 12(14), 5550.
Danermark, B., Ekstrom, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2019). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. Routledge.
Danquah, P. A., Ahadzie, D. K., & Saakwa-Manu, D. (2019). Assessing the implementation of safety requirements in Ghana's construction industry. Safety Science, 116, 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.035
Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (5th ed.). Open University Press.
Dilanthi, A. M., & David, A. D. (2001). Globalization of business and the internet: The plastic payment card industry. International Business Review, 10(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(00)00042-7
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dudovskiy, J. (2019). Convenience sampling. Retrieved from Research-Methodology.net: https://research-methodology.net/sampling-in-primary-data-collection/convenience-sampling/
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2012). Management research (4th ed.). Sage.
Freeman, R.E., (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Goni, F. A., Shukor, S. A., Mukhtar, M., & Sahran, S. (2015). Environmental sustainability: Research growth and trends. Advanced science letters, 21(2), 192-195.
Gustav, S., & Axel, B. (2020). Performance evaluation of circular business models in construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120824
Haber, J. (1998). The new construction conflict resolution handbook. The Construction Publishers and Distributors Association.
Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2007). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. Teachers College Press.
Hueskes, M., Verhoest, K., & Block, T. (2017). Governing public–private partnerships for sustainability: An analysis of procurement and governance practices of PPP infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1184–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.004
Ketokivi, M., & Mantere, S. (2010). Two strategies for inductive reasoning in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 315-333.
Ketokivi, M.,& Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004
King, L. A. (2004). Measures and Meanings: The Use of Qualitative Data in Social and Personality Psychology.
Korsakienė, R., Diskienė, D., & Smaliukienė, R. (2015). Institutional theory perspective and internationalisation of firms. How institutional context influence the internationalisation of SMES? Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2014.2.3(3)
Kothari, C. R. (2011). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Kulatunga, U., Amaratunga, R., & Haigh, R. (2007). Structuring the unstructured data: The use of content analysis. Built Environment & Architecture, 2(1), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijae.v2i1.96
Lewis, J. (2015). Constructing public opinion: How political elites do what they like and why we seem to go along with it. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/lewi17180
Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). On the nature of qualitative evidence. New Directions for Evaluation, 2000(87), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1186
London, T. (2008). The role of leadership development in sustainable international youth development. New Directions for Youth Development, 2008(118), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.272
Loosemore, M. (2016). Social research methods. Palgrave.
Mantere, S., & Ketokivi, M. (2013). Reasoning in organisation science. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 70-89.
Mintzberg, H., 1987. The strategy concept I: Five Ps for strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), pp.11–24.
Morelli, J. (2011). Environmental Sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals.
Naoum, S. G. (2002). Dissertation research and writing for construction students. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches(5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Nissinen, A., Parikka, K., & Nurmesniemi, M. (2009). Consumer participation in waste management. Waste Management and Research, 27(6), 539-546. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0734242X09105008
One Planet Network (2015); May 4, 2023
Oppenheim, A. N. (2003). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Parthirage, S., Renukappa, S., & Suresh, S. (2005). Construction industry productivity improvement using strategic project framework. Construction Innovation, 5(2), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170510850818
Preuss, L., 2009. Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: the case of local government. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(3), pp.213-223.
Public Procurement Act, 2003 (Act663) as amended, (Act 914) 2016.
Rajasekar, S., Philominathan, P. and Chinnathambi, V. (2013). Research methodology. arXiv preprint arXiv:physics/0601009. https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0601009.pdf
Reichertz, J. (2007). Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. In A. Bryant and K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (p. 214–228). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Rode, P., Floater, G., Thomopoulos, N., Docherty, J., Schwinger, P., Mahendra, A., & Fang, W. (2017). Accessibility in cities: transport and urban form (pp. 239-273). Springer International Publishing.
Roman, A.V., (2017). Institutionalizing sustainability: A structural equation model of sustainable procurement in US public agencies. Journal of cleaner production, 143, pp.1048-1059.
Ruparathna, R. & Hewage, K., (2015). Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry: challenges and benefits. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 42(6), pp.417-426.
Salmi, A., Quarshie, A. & Leuschner, R., 2016. Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics journals.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research methods for business students (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Scott, W. R., (2013). Institutions and organisations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.
SDG12.7.1. (2021). Degree of implementation of environmentally sound technologies and practices. UN Stats. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/?Text=&Goal=12&Target=12.7
Sexton, M. (2004). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to measuring construction project complexity. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980410511934
Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4-8.
Sourani, A. (2008). Barriers to addressing sustainability in construction: View of contractors. Structural Survey, 26(5), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800810913056
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34
Teddie, C., & Yu, F. (2017). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689877992
Testa, F., Grappio, P., Gusmerotti, N. M., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2016). Examining green public procurement using content analysis: existing difficulties for procurers and useful recommendations. Environment, development and sustainability, 18, 197-219.
Timmons, S., & Ko, D. (2016). A review of the theory and practice of abductive reasoning. In 2016 IEEE international conference on engineering, technology and innovation/IEEE international technology management conference (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
UNEP (2021) Sustainable Public Procurement; How to Wake the Sleeping Giant! Introducing the United Nations Environment Programme's Approach.
UNESCO, Sustainable Development (2021) Sustainable consumption and production. Available at: www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/sustainableconsumptionandproduction, [Accessed 19 July 2023].
Upstill-Goddard, J., Frost, M., & Head, L. (2016). Reducing construction waste: Challenges for project managers. Local Environment, 21(10), 1221–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1116452
Vandenstoep, S. W., & Johnston, D. D. (2007). Research methods for everyday life: Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. John Wiley and Sons, Incorporated.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 AFRICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting and publishing your articles in the African Journal of Applied Research, you agree to transfer the copyright of the Article from the authors to the Journal ( African Journal of Applied Research).